Stonewall accused of attempting to silence barrister who defends biological sex

14 June 2021

• Free Speech
• England & Wales

Reprinted from The Christian Institute

A lawyer is suing Stonewall and her legal chambers, arguing the charity applied pressure to have her investigated for affirming men cannot become women.

Allison Bailey, a barrister who helped to found the lesbian, homosexual, bisexual alliance, says she was silenced “because both my chambers and Stonewall treat people such as me, who hold gender critical beliefs, as being bigoted and unworthy of respect”.

Her case comes as tax consultant Maya Forstater’s claim that ‘gender critical’ beliefs are protected by equality law was upheld by an Employment Appeal Tribunal.

Threat

Bailey released an email from Stonewall to Garden Court Chambers, in which the charity warns the Chambers’ association with the barrister “puts us in a difficult position with yourselves”.

The email accuses her of “calling our work on lesbian, homosexual, bisexual, and transgender equality ‘gender extremism’” and “accusing Stonewall of ‘appalling levels of intimidation, fear and coercion’”. It also linked to several tweets Bailey had ‘liked’ and ‘retweeted’ affirming biological sex.

The email said: “These actions and their link to Garden Court Chambers, threatens the positive relationship yourselves have built with the trans community”.

Under pressure

Stonewall’s legal bid to strike out Bailey’s case, was rejected in February by Judge Holly Stout.

She said the bid “plainly seeks to put pressure on Chambers to take action against the Claimant”.

plainly seeks to put pressure on Chambers to take action against the Claimant

The judge added that Stonewall was “urging Chambers to remove the Claimant from Chambers”, accompanying this with a threat about their relationship going forward.

Maya Forstater

Last week, Maya Forstater, who lost her job for defending the reality of biological sex, won her appeal.

The former tax consultant lost her job in 2019 after tweeting that biology determines whether people are male or female. An employment tribunal ruled she had not been treated unlawfully, as ‘gender critical’ beliefs were not protected by equality law.

But Mr. Justice Choudhury has now declared that the tribunal was in error and that Forstater’s beliefs are protected under the Equality Act 2010.

After her successful case, Forstater said: “I am delighted to have been vindicated. I lost my job simply for expressing a view that is true and important, and held by the great majority of people in this country: sex matters.”