One world governnace.

Oh, you’ll be able to keep your flags and tongues, and cuisines — as long as American fast food corporations don’t decimate those — but one world governance is already upon us. It just hasn’t become fully recognized and administered. 

YET…

World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland

 

If you for an instant believe the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic is over you’d best pause and begin really paying attention. I’m not referencing the actual virus making people ill — I’m referencing the restructuring of our world as a result of the pandemic.

Set aside thoughts of masks, so-called vaccines that weren’t really vaccines in the true sense of a vaccine, set aside the various restrictions in countries. I’m writing about the continued reordering of the world. The COVID-19 pandemic, which, forgive me if you adhere to the party line in all or most things, but it did not begin in a mixed live animal market in Communist China about two or three miles from one of the world’s largest virology labs in the world in Wuhan that works continually on gain-of-function experiments pertaining directly to the myriad COVID strains associated with bats. Among its many other pursuits. What occurred was with intent. Reason. To move the world forward, closer, more easily controlled, and manipulated toward what evil’s ultimate lust and goal is.

It was a grand worldwide experiment. A particular phase carried out to determine the results to provide valuable information to the powers of this world as to how to proceed next and further.

What they, what evil has in its cold dead heart isn’t coming. Something on down the road far into the future. No, it’s already here. It’s been in the works and has begun. In earnest.

One world governance is already here. And has been constructed and built over the many decades since World War I and World War II to where we now sit. Obeying the edicts and dictates of the power of evil through various world organizations and governments — all coming together with one goal.

If you are truly interested in learning the truth and what this goal is — and the results of these actions taken I cannot urge you enough to get ahold of a book called the Holy Bible. And become literate, and fluent in its contents. Not reading it as any other book. Not merely picking it up and reading. Pray before even opening its cover and casting your eyes on its pages and words. Cast your heart, spirit, mind, and soul to God asking the Individual of the Holy Spirit to help you, show you, instruct you, and provide you with the only truly valuable wisdom found on this earth, the only eternal wisdom that can be and is only found in God’s Word.

Prepare. Equip yourself. For what now is and what is yet to come.

Ken Pullen, A CROOKED PATH, Friday, February 24th, 2023

 

“No Precedent”: Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. Moves to Bind U.S. to Future World Health Organization Pandemic Policies

 

February 21, 2023

By Dan Hart

Reprinted from The Washington Stand

 

Over the weekend, reports surfaced that the Biden administration was preparing to enter the United States into a “legally binding” agreement with the World Health Organization (WHO) that would grant the entity authority to mandate America’s health care policies in the event of a future pandemic. Experts say the proposed plan would be an unprecedented violation of the Constitution, which grants the Senate the authority to approve international treaties.

In order for the proposed treaty to be enacted, it would need to be ratified by all 194 WHO member countries. A meeting is scheduled for February 27 in order to work out the final terms of the treaty.

According to The Epoch Times, after a global health emergency is declared, the agreement would grant the WHO the authority to determine “treatments, government regulations such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates, global supply chains, and monitoring and surveillance of populations” of all 194 member countries. The WHO is based in Geneva, Switzerland and is a subsidiary of the United Nations.

“There’s never been a bigger power grab than this power grab,” said former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann on Monday’s edition of “Washington Watch with Tony Perkins.” “It’s counterintuitive because normally a nation doesn’t want to give away its power.”

Bachmann, who currently serves as dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University, went on to observe that the proposed treaty would take away governmental sovereignty regarding health care decisions from the top down in the U.S.

“[T]his means … that our politicians in the United States would have no power,” she said. “We would lose our voice as a people. Attorney[s] general would lose their voice. Our Supreme Court, federal courts, [and] state courts would lose authority. Even your local doctor that you go to would lose authority because the executive director of the World Health Organization would be empowered to make decisions over vaccines, masks, lockdowns, [and] supply chains.”

As far back as 2013, the WHO has been embroiled in controversy over its decisions regarding disease outbreaks. The organization “took five months to declare a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) over Ebola [in West Africa], a delay that ‘undoubtedly contributed to the unprecedented scale of the outbreak,’ according to one academic assessment.”

Since the beginning of the global COVID pandemic in January 2020, the WHO continued to make controversial decisions. Appearing to take the lead of China during the initial outbreak, the WHO declared that there was “no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission” of the virus on January 14, before reversing itself a week later. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus also commended China’s “transparency” and “leadership” during the initial outbreak, despite evidence that Chinese authorities attempted to cover it up.

Nevertheless, the Biden administration is reportedly moving ahead with agreeing to the “zero draft” of the WHO’s pandemic treaty. Bachmann pointed to church closures as an example of what can happen when single entities are given expanded authority over local jurisdictions.

“[W]e saw churches being closed because the CDC was making recommendations at the U.S. federal level,” she noted. “We push[ed] back, and states were trying to push back. Now there would be no difference. There couldn’t be a Florida or a Texas or a red state that could opt for freedom. The [WHO] … would have the power to monitor all of our states and surveil us. And this also creates digital passports for our health care … [W]e would lose our power over our health care decisions.”

Bachmann further predicted future consequences of the proposed treaty that could reach far beyond health care.

“There is no precedent, because the bottom line impact of what this means is this would create a platform for global governance,” she underscored. “That’s never happened before. The UN has wanted that for years. A number of organizations like the World Economic Forum are advocating a form of global government. … [T]he Biden administration is … trying to do it through what we call a global pandemic treaty, but they call an accord. They’re trying to bypass the U.S. Senate, but they’re also trying to do it by changing the rules at the [WHO]. They’re going down two tracks because they’re determined to reach their goal, which is giving away U.S. sovereignty. … [I]n effect, this would … create a medical police state, not just for the United States, but for all countries of the world.”

“People need to melt the phone lines of U.S. senators and tell them that they need to demand that this treaty comes into the Senate for a hearing,” Bachmann concluded.

Topics:

Dan Hart is senior editor at The Washington Stand.