Would you consider, in general, the countries comprising Europe to be more liberal than conservative? Do you realize that 46 of the 47 nations making up Europe require ID in order to vote? Do they have black people in Europe? Humm…other ethnicities, minorities? And yet 46 out of 47 European nations require photo ID. No ID. No vote. Simple. Logical. Rational. Sensible when it comes to something as important as electing those who will govern, introducing potential new laws into a land and upon a people.
74% of European nations totally ban absentee voting for citizens who reside domestically, and an additional 6% of European nations limit absentee voting to those who are hospitalized or serving in the military.
Imagine that.
What do European nations know that we do not in America? Perhaps one person one vote, the right person on the voting registers actually being the person voting under that name, in that place? Otherwise, any election will produce a false result that would lead to disastrous consequences. Think Russia. Think Communist China. Think of Germany in the late 1920s and early 1930s. Yes, THAT severe of possible consequence. We’re more than halfway there already in America.
Where voter fraud is a sport. And not only adopted, applauded but approved of and fought tooth and nail to keep thriving and growing.
Yet in America, every and any effort to require as accurate and honest an election as possible is fought vehemently. By one side of the political ideology spectrum. Where voter fraud is a sport to those on that side of things. An integral part of the revolution, the toppling of America from within. These sinister practices are not only adopted and applauded but approved of and fought tooth and nail to keep thriving and growing.
Why is this? It certainly isn’t out of their love, concern, compassion, and dedication to helping black people. Their long history belies it being any of those attributes.
Think having to produce a real photo ID of yourself is asking far, far too much in order to vote in America?
The following nations require a BIOMETRIC ID IN ORDER TO EVER VOTE:
Armenia
Angola
Bangladesh
Bhutan
Bolivia
Brazil
Burkina Faso
Cambodia
Cameroon
Chad
Columbia
Comoros
Congo
Costa Rica
Cote d’Ivoire
Dominican Republic
Fiji, Gambia
Ghana
Guatemala, India
Iraq, Kenya
Lesotho, Liberia
Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico
Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia
Nepal
Nicaragua, Nigeria
Panama, Peru
Philippines
Senegal, Sierra Leone
Solomon Islands, Somaliland, Swaziland
Tanzania
Uganda, Uruguay
Venezuela
Yemen
Zambia
and Zimbabwe
While in America we call requiring a photo ID to prove you are who you are suppressing the vote.
“Suppressing the vote” is code for “We won’t be able to rig elections or at least try to right them in our favor.”
Period.
What is the problem with having to produce a photo ID and being the person voting who is actually on the voting register?
We have dead people voting. Rampant voter fraud. Stuffing of drop boxes and election boards with paid-for mail-in ballots — actually paying, bribing people to vote for who they are paid to vote for. Yes, this takes place in America, mail-in ballots filled out under duress, phony, multiple mail-in ballots, and on and on and on it goes in America for every election. Too many drop boxes everywhere. intimidation outside of polling stations.
I’m not writing about Russia here. Or North Korea or Iran. This is America presently.
And it’s only getting worse.
And those opposed to as clean, fair, and honest an election as possible are screaming that requiring ID goes against democracy? Are you kidding? Democracy is the LAST THING the liberal left side wants to see in any election at this time.
Make sure not to forget to come back to this;
Rise in Mail-in-Voting: A Convenience or Pathway to Fraud?
When done reading the article below.
The state that my wife and I live in requires a photo ID in order to vote for many years. It isn’t a problem. It’s only a problem for anyone trying to circumvent the law. To commit a criminal act. To hide, to deceive, to be up to no good. Otherwise, why all the protestations, the lawsuits and so much effort being put into doing everything possible to ban having to produce a photo ID in order to vote?
What’s the big deal?
Well, the big deal is that the left won’t be able to so easily corrupt any and every election if photo ID is required and other aspects of the rampant voter fraud, and egregious mail-in ballots are addressed.
Ken Pullen, Tuesday, March 5th, 2024
Garland beefing up team to fight ID rule, drop box limits
March 5, 2024
By Kerry Picket
Reprinted from The Washington Times
Attorney General Merrick Garland said on the eve of the Super Tuesday primaries that states requiring voter ID at the polls and restricting drop boxes are suppressing Black voters, and the Justice Department has doubled the number of its lawyers to fight those laws.
Mr. Garland said recent court decisions have “drastically” weakened the 1965 Voting Rights Act, and that in the wake of those rulings, states have dramatically increased laws that make it harder for millions of eligible voters to vote. He said such measures “threaten the foundation of our system of government” and that the Justice Department is “fighting back” with more lawyers in its Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division.
“That is why we are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements,” Mr. Garland said Sunday at the Tabernacle Baptist Church in Selma, Alabama.
Voters in 36 states are asked for a form of identification. In 14 states and the District of Columbia, no form of ID is requested to cast a ballot.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, eight states have implemented voter ID laws since the 2020 election: Arkansas, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio and Wyoming.
The laws are expected to impact about 29 million adults, and 1 in 6 voters who must abide by new voter ID laws live in key battleground states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
Voters in North Carolina and Arkansas on Super Tuesday will also face stringent voter ID laws.
Responding to Mr. Garland, a Republican National Committee spokesperson said polling, including a recent Pew Research Poll, shows that 88% of Americans support voter ID, including 82% of Black voters and 83% of Hispanic voters.
The spokesperson, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said President Biden used the same rhetoric as Mr. Garland when Georgia passed new voting legislation in 2021, but turnout spiked in the next election cycle. According to a 2023 UGA poll, no Black Georgia voters rated their voting experience as “poor” under the new law.
“The idea that widely supported election integrity measures are somehow inherently discriminatory is little more than a conspiracy theory,” the RNC spokesperson said.
The Washington Times reached out to the Justice Department for comment but did not hear back.
Mr. Garland spoke during the 59th commemoration of “Bloody Sunday,” the 1965 Civil Rights march across the Edmund Pettis Bridge in Selma, when racial tensions erupted and violence broke out as the marchers were met by state troopers. Some of the state troopers beat the marchers with clubs.
The attorney general said, while there has been much progress made to push forward equal voting rights, much is left to be done.
“Indeed, throughout our country’s history — before Bloody Sunday, and after — the right to vote in America has been under attack,” Mr. Garland said. “It was under attack in the wake of the Civil War and amidst Reconstruction, when White supremacists used violence and threats of violence to stop Black Americans from exercising their right to vote.”
Mr. Garland said the Justice Department was founded with the primary purpose of protecting the rights guaranteed in the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, which abolished slavery, granted citizenship to former slaves and granted Black men the right to vote. He said places like Selma created Jim Crow laws and implemented impossible-to-pass proficiency tests.
“And the right to vote was under attack on Sunday, March 7, 1965, when civil rights activists set out to march from Selma to Montgomery and were met with horrific violence,” he said, which ushered in the Voting Rights Act of 1965, “which gave the Justice Department important authorities to protect the right to vote.”
He credited the 59-year-old law for the Justice Department being able to block more than 1,200 “restrictive voting changes in jurisdictions with a history of suppressing the vote.”
RELATED:
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.