Misuse of words. Just because the world has adopted, accepted, and approves of certain words, and demands them, along with nonsensical acronyms that keep growing longer by the month does not mean that true disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ ought to succumb, be lazy, and add to the ignorance, the darkness, the misdirection and lies.

We will be held accountable for every word uttered or written. Why comply with the world that exists to further deception, deceit, decadence, darkness, misdirection, corruption, removal of truth, and selecting of lies?

This is not the evolution of language as I had a very lost young elder tell me earlier this year. It is the reconstruction, the corruption, the decay, and the perversion of language. Meanings. Understanding. Clarity, And has not and will not lead anyone to a better place, a better understanding.

Quite the opposite.

Stop being lazy. Stop being complicit. Stop being like the world in these matters and begin to speak, to write, to stand firmly and boldly for the truth, facts, reality, and the Lord.

Are we of the world and more concerned with appeasing, complying, accommodating, accepting, and approving of everything that comes along leading to further decay, erosion, and destruction of every foundation? Or are we to stand against the onslaught of this world as defenders of the faith, a peculiar people, a different people, a chosen people distinguished from the world — by how we fashion ourselves?

And our speech, what we write is one of the greatest ways to exhibit light in the darkness, to be distinguished from the world.

How about educating those consumed in darkness and lies, consumed by ignorance in this world, and revealing light and truth and clarity to them rather than appearing no different than them?

What are you afraid of?

Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.

Matthew 10:28

Is it that difficult for you to speak or write accurately rather than being indistinguishable from the world that is ignorant and are darkness while also living in darkness?

Complicit or resistant to evil, the deconstruction, and the destruction of language?

Yes, I removed the mind-numbing lazy acronyms, and he misuse of words and definitions and edited out all the complying with the world dung in the article below and inserted the accurate descriptions.

When reading it, or reading it aloud, it makes much more sense, or ought to, to a true disciple of the Lord Jesus Christ, to anyone really, than the nonsense, the mind-numbing misdirection, and easing while appeasing word games and ploys implemented by the world.

Supplanting the truth with the lies. It’s what the world does best. Either stand aside and firmly opposed and different or be indistinguishable.

Oh, and no church, no person is a Christian who adopts, accepts, accommodates, and approves of the sexually immoral, the sexually perverted, the sexually deviant. Can we stop calling them Christians and calling them what they are? If confused about what a true Christian is there is a book that clearly, completely clarifies and reveals what a true Christian is — and it is not a sexually immoral, sexually deviant, sexually abnormal, sexually perverted individual, or church that accepts and approves of such.

Writing such is not a lack of love. To the contrary. It’s out of an abundance of love for the Lord, for what is true and concern to any and all taking the wrong way in this life that only leads to eternal destruction of the eternal soul, just as the Lord Jesus Christ said above. Making the world happy, appeasement, tolerance of sin and lies, accommodating and approving of sin and lies is not the solution to what ails this world…

Read on…

Ken Pullen, Sunday, November 26th, 2023

Churches are facing a choice: Scriptural revelation, or Sexual Revolution?

The Cross Of Christ Or The Rainbow Flag?

The choice before churches is clear. In the next few years, we will see those clinging to orthodoxy shrink dramatically – and there will be cultural consequences for this. 

November 21, 2023

By Jonathon Van Maren

Reprinted from LifeSite News, The Bridgehead, & Prophecy News Watch

(LifeSiteNews) — In the coming decade, Carl Trueman wrote recently, every single church still calling itself Christian will face a choice: Do we follow Scriptural revelation, or the Sexual Revolution? Catechism, or culture? In the world, or of the world? The cross, or the rainbow flag? 

Mainline Protestantism has, for the most part, cast its lot in with the sexually abnormal, sexually perverted, deviant, and immoral movement, with their clergy serving primarily as a convenient way for sexually deviant and perveryted activists to accuse pastors who still hold to Christian orthodoxy of bigotry. (If those Christians can cave and still call themselves Christian, why can’t you?) These days, you can identify however you want – you can even call yourself a Christian while backing sex changes for minors and championing the destruction of the biblical sexual ethic. 

Trueman’s prediction is already proving prescient – one by one, every Christian denomination is facing the choice, and most are splitting over it. Kristin Kobes du Mez, the mainstream media’s favorite Christian Reformed scholar, has become gay-affirming. Andy Stanley, the well-known evangelical pastor of North Point Ministries in Atlanta, Georgia, recently hosted a conference affirming sexually immoral, perverted, and deviant ideology over Christian orthodoxy. For those who want a bit of religion and the Sexual Revolution at the same time, there is a growing number of options. 

We saw this recently at the Church of England’s General Synod, where clergy vote to allow standalone services for homosexual couples which are referred to as “blessings” after same-sex “marriage” ceremonies, the latest Anglican attempt to have it both ways. Formally, they still reject same-sex “marriage” – much to the chagrin and outright outrage of the more revolutionary clergy – but bit by bit, their theological real estate is being colonized under the rainbow flag. Indeed, Marcus Walker, rector of St. Bartholomew the Great Church, announced his support for homosexual “marriage” at the Anglican synod, stating – without a hint of irony – that this would mean “difficult conversations with fellow conservatives.” 

Another major denomination is splitting once again before the end of this year. The North Georgia Conference of the United Methodist Church voted on November 18 to accept the decision of 261 congregations to permanently depart the denomination over the 2019 UMC decision to hold to Christian orthodoxy on sexually immoral, deviant, and perverted issues. At the time, the denomination had also voted to allow dissenting congregations to leave by the end of 2023 “for reasons of conscience regarding a change in the requirements and provisions of the Book of Discipline related to the practice of homosexuality or the ordination of marriage of self-avowed practicing homosexuals.” 

This has added to a growing exodus, with CNN reporting that as “of early August 2023, over 6,000 congregations of just over 30,000 in the United States have been approved for disaffiliation since 2019, according to the UMC’s website. The 261 churches now leaving the North Georgia Conference of the UMC account for a sizable percentage of its nearly 700 churches, according to the conference’s website. Their exit marked a “solemn day,” the North Georgia Conference of the UMC said in a news release.” 

The UMC is the second-largest Protestant denomination in America, and their division follows major splits over sexually immoral, perverted, and deviant issues in the American Baptist Churches USA, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the Episcopal Church, and the Presbyterian Church USA. Conservative denominations should recognize that the cultural pressure cooker has hardly begun to heat up, and that laity-led revolts over Christian orthodoxy will become increasingly common over the next decade, as well. We already see frequent press stories featuring interviews with congregants disgruntled that their church refuses to get with the times; these interviews and stories are an attempt to push church leaders in the “progressive” direction.  

The choice before churches is clear. In the next few years, we will see those clinging to orthodoxy shrink dramatically – and there will be cultural consequences for this.