It’s real simple. Continue to follow evil, and that’s what all those who have created and pushed these delusions and lies regarding gender, sexuality, sexual preferences — perversions, deviancies, and immoralities — and not only find yourself tongue tied, confused, annoyed, and worried about keeping up with the lost culture that does nothing but corrupt and misuse language, but find yourself in hell one day for a very long time.
When will the laziness, the stupidity, the compliance with lunacy and absurdity stop, and sense, reason, rational thought, critical thinking, and using the right words start?
Had enough yet?
Because it isn’t going to improve.
Evil never rests. Evil will never stop. Evil always wants to consume more, kill more, destroy more, infect more, delude more, and enslave more.
There is only one way out.
Follow rational thinking, reason, logic, sense, critical thinking, and the facts; follow the truth. Follow the whole Word of God, never wavering. Stop following the world. Its path is very wide. Almost everyone is on it. It leads to one place. Where those arriving there will have eternal regret.
Drop all the acronyms.
Acronyms were created for things such as the FBI, CIA, AAA, and such. Not to make sexual deviancy, sexual perversion, and the father of lies happy, not to make evil dance and shout by removing words, definitions, and creating diversion — not diversity. Working destruction, not tolerance. Increasing evil, not love.
“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.”
Matthew 7:13-14
Read on…
Ken Pullen, Saturday, April 11th, 2026
The Newest Woke Acronym That Broke the Internet – MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+
April 11, 2026
By PNW Staff
Reprinted from Prophecy News Watch
There was a time when political language aimed to clarify reality. Today, it increasingly seems designed to obscure it–and nowhere is that more obvious than in the latest spectacle out of Canada.
A Canadian Member of Parliament recently delivered a speech warning of “genocide” against a group identified by the sprawling acronym MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+.
The acronym stands for: Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women, Girls, and Two‑Spirit (a term that is used by some First Nations to describe people who embody both masculine and feminine spirits), Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, Intersex, and Asexual people. +: is the inclusive sign for all other gender identities and sexual orientations in case some were missed because there seem to be new ones every week.
For most ordinary people watching, the reaction was disbelief–followed quickly by ridicule.
Because at some point, language stops informing–and starts collapsing under its own weight.
The issue of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls is real, serious, and deserves attention. But what’s happening now is something else entirely. That real and urgent issue is being wrapped in layer upon layer of ideological language–so much so that the original purpose risks getting buried under the sheer absurdity of its presentation.
And people are noticing.
The acronym itself has become the story–not the victims it’s supposed to represent. What began as a targeted effort to address violence has morphed into an ever-expanding identity checklist, one that now includes a wide range of categories spanning sexuality, gender identity, and abstract classifications that the average person can barely define, let alone keep track of or even pronounce.
When everything is included, nothing is emphasized.
That’s not inclusivity. That’s dilution.
And increasingly, it’s being treated exactly that way–especially online.
Across social media platforms, the reaction has been swift and brutal. The acronym is being openly mocked, parodied, and turned into memes. People are joking about “running out of letters,” questioning what the “+” even means anymore, and pointing out–sometimes sarcastically, sometimes bluntly–that this kind of language feels completely detached from reality.
Now, critics of that reaction will argue that mockery is insensitive. But it’s also revealing.
Because ridicule at this scale doesn’t come out of nowhere–it comes from a growing sense that something has gone too far.
It’s a signal. A cultural one.
It suggests that what was once taken seriously is no longer landing the same way with the average person. Not because people suddenly stopped caring about certain issues–but because the way they are being framed has become so exaggerated, so overcomplicated, that it undermines its own credibility.
In other words, when everything is framed as a crisis, people eventually stop believing anything is.
Individuals are being pushed into smaller and smaller identity boxes, encouraged to see themselves not as people first, but as members of increasingly specific grievance groups.
And once that happens, everything changes.
The world is no longer a place of opportunity or challenge–it becomes a landscape of oppression. Every interaction is filtered through identity. Every disagreement becomes suspect. And every expansion of the acronym becomes necessary–not because it clarifies reality, but because the system itself depends on constant expansion to survive.
That’s the part few want to say out loud.
This isn’t just about recognition anymore. It’s about maintaining a framework–a kind of ideological ecosystem–where new categories must continually be introduced to justify its existence. A grievance structure that requires constant growth.
And like any system built on endless expansion, it eventually becomes unsustainable–and, frankly, unserious
That’s why the backlash is no longer confined to political commentators or niche circles. It’s gone mainstream. It’s in comment sections, group chats, and everyday conversations. People aren’t just disagreeing–they’re laughing.
Real victims don’t need longer acronyms. They need action. They need clarity, not confusion.
Instead, what they’re getting in moments like this is something that feels performative–an exercise in ideological signaling that prioritizes language over results, categories over solutions.
And the public sees it.
That’s why the reaction has been so sharp, so immediate, and yes–so mocking.
Not because people don’t care.
But because they’re starting to feel like the people in charge don’t understand how far removed this has become from reality.
There’s a limit to how much complexity a culture can absorb before it starts to reject it outright. There’s a limit to how many labels can be added before the entire structure begins to look less like inclusion–and more like absurdity.
We may have just found that limit.
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.