News Image

 

 

What is written about in the article below isn’t a reshaping of the American political structure — it would be the end of America. America would exist in name only. Any semblance to the Republic created by the Founders would vanish.

This is due to massive, chronic apathy and stupidity on the part of the so-called “good” upstanding law-abiding American people. Numb, insulated, deluded, convinced America would never ever be anything but the illusion they hold in their minds, if they think about this at all, other than some folks do during an election cycle.

I graduated from high school in 1971.

I wrote a paper in my senior year, in a government, social studies class that was combination of history and current events. I received a D on the paper.

The teacher didn’t give me that grade because the paper was so poorly written. No, he wrote in the margin, and also told me in front of the class, I got the grade I did because it wasn’t a creative writing class, it was a government, social studies, history, and current events class.

Why did he say what he did about my paper and give me the grade he did?

Because I wrote that America in the future would become more like the Soviet Union, a mutation of captialistic communism/socialism, and that the Soviet Union would become more like America with regard to capitalism and mutating their brand of communism/socialism.

This was a fantasy to the teacher. And my classmates. He said what I wrote would never happen. Not in America!

Still want to recite the utter nonsense, Babel-on, that “children are our future,” with the mindset in so saying they are going to create a better future? Why would anyone ever think that would be the case, or assume that? Anyone paying attention to the course of history? Hello, professing Chrsitans! Ever read the Holy Bible? Do you believe it?

So much Babel-on about where America is in the Bible, oh, America won’t be involved in the whole Antichrist, anti-Israel stuff, America is different, America will be maintained.

Should have learned, believed, and taken to heart, done something about Mr. Franklin’s reply to Elizabeth Willing Powel’s question, on September 17, 1787, when she asked Benjamin Franklin, “What do we have, a republic or a monarchy?”

And Mr. Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

It’s clear that the overwhelming majority of people in America in the last 60 years or so have had no interest in keeping the republic and haven’t been concerned enough, aware enough, believing enough to keep it. Thus, allowing evil to grow and have its way.

Allowing communism and socialism to be taught in schools, in government, in our institutions.

To indoctrinate, slowly, ever so slowly, awaiting opportunity to let loose, capturing youth, to establish itself and destroy all the foundations.

America can become one of the most oppressive, fascist, socialist, lost nations on earth. That is possible. Stop being lulled, complacent, otherwise occupied, in denial, deluded, lazy, and leaving everything up to others.

Evil never rests, never pauses, and appears like something good, desirable to people. Exactly like it first appeared in the Garden of Eden.

If thinking people will bring about the kingdom of God on earth. Think again. God brings about His kingdom on earth. Not people.

If thinking America is too special to fall. Think again.

Best prepare, folks. Best prepare in the ways and word of the LORD. Eyes, heart, mind, spirit on eternity, while also living up to our duty while here. Because America is swiftly vanishing and not becoming a monarchy or remaining a republic, but heading to fascism, to a mutated communism/socialism that still idolizes stuff, things, and consumerism. A different Russia, a different China, a different Nazi Germany [as our antisemitism is on track to rival that of Germany’s in the 1930s and 1940s if we do not awaken, repent, and turn from our wicked ways], but still called America, and being some of the most deluded, lost people on earth.

I wonder what grade I’d get on that paper if I turned it into Mr. McClellan today…?

Read on…

Ken Pullen, Monday, September 8th, 2025

 

 

Dangerous Trends: Majority Of Young Americans Favor Socialist Candidates in 2028

 

September 08, 2025

By PNW Staff — Prophecy News Watch

Reprinted from Prophecy News Watch

 

A recent Rasmussen poll has sent shockwaves through political circles: 53 percent of likely voters under 40 say they want a socialist candidate to win the 2028 presidential election. Even more alarming, 76 percent of these young voters support nationalizing major industries, from healthcare to energy to big tech. These figures are not merely abstract statistics–they signal a profound shift in the political psyche of a generation that could reshape American governance in ways few fully understand.

The surge in socialist support among youth is deeply intertwined with the education system and broader cultural trends. From college classrooms to social media feeds, young Americans are consistently exposed to narratives framing capitalism as inherently exploitative and unjust.

Concepts like wealth inequality, corporate influence, and economic privilege dominate discussions, often with little balance or context regarding the benefits of market-driven innovation and personal responsibility. Add to this a curriculum that frequently emphasizes collectivist theories over individual agency, and it is no wonder so many young voters equate government control with fairness and security.

The economic challenges of modern life–soaring housing costs, student debt, and perceived inequities in the labor market–have only intensified these sentiments. According to the Rasmussen poll, 31 percent of young voters cited high housing costs as the primary reason they favor socialism. Another 17 percent believe the U.S. economy disproportionately benefits older, wealthier Americans. These concerns, while real, have been channeled into support for policies that historically have failed wherever implemented at scale.

Socialism promises equity, stability, and universal access to essential services, but the reality is starkly different. From Venezuela to Cuba to the former Soviet Union, socialist experiments have led not to utopia but to economic collapse, scarcity, and political repression. Venezuela, once Latin America’s richest country, now faces hyperinflation, food shortages, and mass migration. Cuba continues to struggle with stagnant growth and limited freedom, while Eastern Europe’s experience under Soviet socialism demonstrates the costs of centralizing economic control at the expense of innovation and individual initiative. In short, socialism has repeatedly failed to deliver the promised prosperity.

Yet the appeal persists among young Americans, in part because many have become reliant on government intervention in everyday life. Stimulus checks, student loan programs, and expanded welfare benefits have fostered a perception that government is not just a safety net but the ultimate solution to systemic problems. The danger here is profound: when an entire generation sees central control as the key to a “better life,” it erodes the cultural memory of past failures and opens the door to policies that could cripple freedom, entrepreneurship, and economic resilience.

Nowhere is this dynamic more visible than in New York City, where socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani’s unexpected primary win demonstrates the political potency of these ideas. With nearly 40 percent support in a crowded field, Mamdani has captured the imagination of voters eager for radical change. But what they are likely to find, as history and economic realities suggest, is a city grappling with budget crises, mismanaged public services, and the unintended consequences of overreach. The promise of a socialist utopia–affordable housing, universal healthcare, equitable opportunity–is far easier to advertise than to deliver.

As New York teeters on the edge of a bold experiment in governance, the rest of the nation should pay close attention. What begins as youthful idealism may quickly evolve into economic stagnation, service shortages, and a tightening grip of government bureaucracy. Those who champion socialism often highlight the “equity” it promises, but equity imposed from above comes at the cost of liberty, choice, and innovation. For the young Americans driving this movement, it is a cautionary tale in the making: the lure of government solutions is strong, but the lessons of history are undeniable.

If New York becomes a proving ground for socialist policies, the city’s residents may soon discover that the promised egalitarian paradise is, in practice, a complex web of dependency, inefficiency, and constrained opportunity. And when the problems emerge, as they inevitably will, the political and economic fallout could reverberate far beyond city limits–serving as a warning to a nation increasingly captivated by the siren song of socialism.