The newly vocal antisemitic “Right” seems to represent regress masquerading as rebellion. They do not actually speak for the “Right;” they speak for themselves and for the social media algorithms that reward outrage and sounding outrageous. Pictured: Tucker Carlson speaks at Turning Point USA in Phoenix, Arizona, on December 18, 2025. (Photo by Olivier Touron / AFP via Getty Images)

Shame on Turning Point USA for continuing to enlist one of the major lieutenants of Satan, Tucker Carlson, and shame on anyone so ignorant as to think and then believe the left is this, the right is that, and, of course, the left is wrong, and the right is, well, right — because they belong to the Republican Party.

Think about that. Since they don’t, and aren’t, and won’t.

But then…

“For certain men have crept in unnoticed, who long ago were marked out for this condemnation, ungodly men, who turn the grace of our God into lewdness and deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ.”

Jude 1:4

This is what happens when people are indoctrinated from birth, are weak, and refuse to think for themselves, to ponder, examine, think critically, use logic, seek true wisdom and knowledge [which only comes from God, not from any source within the world], take time to learn and know real history, and can be objective. Ahhh, objectivity. So elusive and rare in times such as this. It’s so much easier for the lazy mind, the 20th and 21st century soft Western, American mind to just bypass all that and jump on the passing wagon coming through town pulled by either a donkey or an elephant.

You can’t be a true Christian, born again, and be anti-Israel, anti-Jew.

It’s impossible.

Not according to me. According to God. Get a hold of the Book that God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit wrote and rightly divide, discern its words. Cleansing the heart and mind of everything learned by the words of the world. Then proceed.

So, when the darkness, the evil spouts off and sends its horrible hateful vitriol into the airwaves to be heard and adopted by the masses who refuse to ever think because, well, that requires some time, effort, and perhaps having existing lies and misinformation toppled and in need of changing, the mass of darkness just gets darker. Instead of allowing evil to have its way, the light shines brightly and disperses the darkness, being as salty as possible.

Millions, billions are drawn to and follow the lies. Serve the darkness. Make evil happy and do a dance, a jig in glee, thinking it’s — he’s winning. Ahhh, those enslaved to and serving their master, Satan, will learn an eternal lesson, the most difficult to endure, that no one should endure. But they will. Until and unless they reject the darkness, the father of lies, their great deceiver and seducer that’s been at work since that day in the Garden of God, and until and unless they humble themselves. Bow with a contrite heart and mind, confess their sin, and ask the LORD Jesus Christ to forgive them and for Him to be the LORD of their life, their Saviour, committing right then and there to serve Him, obey Him, follow Him, and to no longer be darkness, but the light of the world, the salt of the earth.

Do not hesitate to call things, people, what they are.

Almost all misunderstand and do not get the beginning of Matthew 7 right. It’s ALL about judging and judging well and correctly! Don’t stop at the first six or seven words, depending on the translation. Jesus could not be clearer, but, just as in the Garden, people turn to the great seducer, the great liar, and listen to him clouding their spirit, their mind in a dense fog of darkness.

Jesus is judging from the first word to the one hundredth. “Hypocrite!” What is that? What is being said from the first word to the last, or is context too much to bear, critical thinking absent, reason nowhere to be found within the reader to understand? Judge all things. Always. Test all things. Always. But first, before judging, make sure the sin, the problem, the issue which ought to be acknowledged and addressed — taken care of in the life of the one with plank in the eye, take care of that before helping your brother, who needs to be judged, rebuked, corrected, and spoken to in order to help him, or her.

Kapish?

“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”

Matthew 7:1-5

Try this on: Yes, leftists are ‘evil.’ Here’s how they got that way—and why you’ll never change them.

Then read on…

But more important than that apply on…

Ken Pullen, Wednesday, February 18th, 2026

The ‘Other Side’ Turns Against the Jews

It’s back. Not the usual anti-Israel vitriol from the so-called “Left” —but a creeping, winking strain of anti-Jewish hostility rising this time inside the American “Right.” This chill is often dressed up as “just asking questions” or “anti-globalism“. How come there never seem to be similar “questions” about Qatar, China, Turkey, Nigeria or Pakistan?

There is nothing new about recycling century-old tropes, flirting with blood libels, or mainstreaming a Holocaust denier because he brings clicks. The American “Right” — at its best — defends the Judeo-Christian foundations of the West, and honors facts, allies and moral clarity. This heritage means standing with Israel and against antisemites, even when the antisemites posture as being on the side of all that is “good.”

Perhaps one can start with those who defended various antisemitic rants (such as here, here and here). The problem is not about failing to tolerate “free speech.” The problem is about failing to examine what is said with follow-up questions. The great Edward R. Murrow invited Senator Joseph McCarthy on CBS television’s See It Now not to give him the run of the corral but to challenge his remarks. The problem is a pattern of tolerating an intolerance that would not be accepted if it were aimed at any ethnic group other than Jews.

Normalize the slur here, wink at a trope there, then insist that critics are “overreacting.” This is how the ideological poison spreads.

There is a gulf between arguing to cut foreign aid and amplifying blood-libel smears.

Then came interviews that allowed the Tucker Carlson moment. On his show, on October 27, 2025, he hosted a Holocaust denier, Nick Fuentes. The interview featured open antisemitic bile and even bizarre praise of both Hitler and Stalin to waft by with, at best, anemically gentle pushback.

By late 2024, the watchdog group Stop Antisemitism citing a dossier of repeat offenses, named Candace Owens its “Antisemite of the Year.”

Even The Nation — no MAGA organ — warned that elements of right-wing anti-Zionism are curdling into open antisemitism and explicitly cites the Heritage Foundation-Tucker Carlson controversy as symptomatic.

To its credit, the American “Right” has no shortage of adults in the room. Many intellectuals, Jewish advocates, elected Republicans, and elected Democrats that you can count on one hand have openly explained that freedom of speech does not require respectable platforms to feature unreconstructed bigots when they accuse “the establishment” of “silencing us.”

Whenever someone habitually slanders Jews and then complains of being “silenced,” it is important to call it out as the two-faced switch that it is. Criticism is not censorship, decency is not “consensus” and the Jewish people are not “clicks.”

The fact is that Republican support for Israel remains high. Pew Research this year found solid GOP confidence in Israel’s leadership and warm views of Israelis. When far-right influencers target Jews, they are out of step with rank-and-file Republican voters — and not speaking for them.

Younger voters, subject to China’s antisemitic and anti-American influence on TikTok, are admittedly more skeptical.

Contrast the fringe to actual governance. Under President Donald J. Trump, the U.S. moved its Embassy to Jerusalem (2018), recognized Israeli sovereignty on the Golan Heights (2019), and brokered the Abraham Accords — historic normalization agreements reshaping the strategic map. These facts remain the gold standard for a pro-ally foreign policy grounded in U.S. interests.

The momentum has continued. Fox News last year reported on efforts to expand the Abraham Accords — with new international candidates openly discussed — precisely because strength plus moral clarity wins respect in the region. Whenever Washington projected resolve rather than courting applause in European salons, anti-terror alignment, economic growth and Western values have advanced.

Meanwhile, serious national security policy continues confronting jihadist groups, backing Israel’s right to self-defense, and leveraging diplomacy (as with the Gulf states) to isolate terrorists. This framework does not require romanticizing any foreign government. It does require rejecting those who would turn “Zionist” into a slur and “globalist” into a dog whistle for “Jew.”

The newly vocal antisemitic “Right” seems to represent regress masquerading as rebellion. They do not actually speak for the “Right;” they speak for themselves and for the social media algorithms that reward outrage and sounding outrageous.

Many – maybe most — prominent members of the “Right” — from Trump to Pastor John Hagee, Thomas Sowell, and Marco Rubio — stand with Israel because they stand with the West, with victims of jihad, and with a commitment to preserve the values of individual freedom, economic opportunity, quality education, freedom of expression and equal justice under the law. The “Right” would do well to say so — clearly, repeatedly, and without apology — and should quarantine the grifters who would trade civilization for “clicks.”

Pierre Rehov, who holds a law degree from Paris-Assas, is a French reporter, novelist and documentary filmmaker. He is the author of six novels, including “Beyond Red Lines”, “The Third Testament” and “Red Eden”, translated from French. His latest essay on the aftermath of the October 7 massacre ” 7 octobre – La riposte ” became a bestseller in France. As a filmmaker, he has produced and directed 17 documentaries, many photographed at high risk in Middle Eastern war zones, and focusing on terrorism, media bias, and the persecution of Christians. His latest documentary, “Pogrom(s)” highlights the context of ancient Jew hatred within Muslim civilization as the main force behind the October 7 massacre.